Baoh
New Member
- Messages
- 917
- Location
- Saint Louis, MO
#1, that was not the site I cut and pasted from... It seems more like a generic definition rather than "someone elses work"...
#2, Below is your cut and paste without citation...
"Test sessions that examined control by olfactory cues revealed that they did not affect performance."
Is this the direction this thread should take or can we keep it on topic without your opinion on how things should be cut and pasted...
What site did you cut and paste from, then? That word stream only came up in one site for my google preferences, and that in turn came from a text, but since you did not disagree that it came from a site, which site did it come from? The words match exactly.
You are conveniently forgetting the reference I gave in post #36 of this thread which you responded to, which prompted the quotation with quotation marks to indicate it was a quotation from the reference I posted in post #36.
Which anyone can plainly see, as I didn't want to be taken on my own say-so without legitimate evidence of such work being performed.
Hey, you can steal other folks' words and present them as if they were your own all you might like. Not my board. That doesn't change the intellectual dishonesty of the matter, as any institution or scientific place of work would not exhibit tolerance over such behavior, and with good reason.
Last edited: